Monte Carlo in the microcanonical ensemble: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by 70.158.67.162 (Talk); changed back to last version by Noe)
 
Line 4: Line 4:




: <math> H(X^{3N},P^{3N}) = \sum_{i=1}^{3N} \frac{p_i^2}{2m}   U \left( X^{3N} \right) </math>; (Eq.1)
: <math> H(X^{3N},P^{3N}) = \sum_{i=1}^{3N} \frac{p_i^2}{2m} + U \left( X^{3N} \right) </math>; (Eq.1)


where:
where:

Latest revision as of 11:20, 4 July 2007

Integration of the kinetic degrees of freedom[edit]

Consider a system of identical particles, with total energy given by:


; (Eq.1)

where:

  • represents the 3N Cartesian position coordinates of the particles
  • stands for the the 3N momenta.


The first term on the right hand side of (Eq. 1) is the kinetic energy, whereas the second term is the potential energy (a function of the positional coordinates).

Now, let us consider the system in a microcanonical ensemble; let be the total energy of the system (constrained in this ensemble).

The probability, of a given position configuration , with potential energy can be written as:

 ; (Eq. 2)

where:

  • .

The Integral in the right hand side of (Eq. 2) corresponds to the surface of a 3N-dimensional () hyper-sphere of radius  ; therefore:

.

See Ref. 1 for an application of Monte Carlo simulation using this ensemble.

References[edit]

  1. N. G. Almarza and E. Enciso "Critical behavior of ionic solids" Physical Review E 64, 042501 (2001) (4 pages)