Carnahan-Starling equation of state: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added the errors given by Clisby and McCoy to the table of virial coefficients.)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:CS_EoS_plot.png|thumb|350px|right]]
The '''Carnahan-Starling equation of state'''  is an approximate (but quite good) [[Equations of state |equation of state]] for the fluid phase of the [[hard sphere model]] in three dimensions. It is given by (Ref <ref name="CH"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1672048 N. F. Carnahan and K. E. Starling,"Equation of State for Nonattracting Rigid Spheres"  Journal of Chemical Physics '''51''' pp. 635-636 (1969)] </ref> Eqn. 10).
The '''Carnahan-Starling equation of state'''  is an approximate (but quite good) [[Equations of state |equation of state]] for the fluid phase of the [[hard sphere model]] in three dimensions. It is given by (Ref <ref name="CH"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1672048 N. F. Carnahan and K. E. Starling,"Equation of State for Nonattracting Rigid Spheres"  Journal of Chemical Physics '''51''' pp. 635-636 (1969)] </ref> Eqn. 10).


Line 6: Line 7:


where:
where:
*<math> Z </math> is the [[compressibility factor]]
*<math> p </math> is the [[pressure]]
*<math> p </math> is the [[pressure]]
*<math> V </math> is the volume
*<math> V </math> is the volume
Line 16: Line 18:


*<math> \sigma </math> is the [[hard sphere model | hard sphere]] diameter.
*<math> \sigma </math> is the [[hard sphere model | hard sphere]] diameter.
The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is not applicable for packing fractions greater than 0.55 <ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0605392 Hongqin Liu "A very accurate hard sphere equation of state over the entire stable and metstable region", arXiv:cond-mat/0605392 (2006)]</ref>.
==Virial expansion==
==Virial expansion==
It is interesting to compare the [[Virial equation of state | virial coefficients]] of the Carnahan-Starling equation of state (Eq. 7 of <ref name="CH"> </ref>) with the [[Hard sphere: virial coefficients | hard sphere virial coefficients]] in three dimensions (exact up to <math>B_4</math>, and those of Clisby and McCoy <ref> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-8080-0  Nathan Clisby and Barry M. McCoy "Ninth and Tenth Order Virial Coefficients for Hard Spheres in D Dimensions", Journal of Statistical Physics '''122''' pp. 15-57 (2006)] </ref>):
It is interesting to compare the [[Virial equation of state | virial coefficients]] of the Carnahan-Starling equation of state (Eq. 7 of <ref name="CH"></ref>) with the [[Hard sphere: virial coefficients | hard sphere virial coefficients]] in three dimensions (exact up to <math>B_4</math>, and those of Clisby and McCoy <ref> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-8080-0  Nathan Clisby and Barry M. McCoy "Ninth and Tenth Order Virial Coefficients for Hard Spheres in D Dimensions", Journal of Statistical Physics '''122''' pp. 15-57 (2006)] </ref>):
{| style="width:40%; height:100px" border="1"
{| style="width:40%; height:100px" border="1"
|-  
|-  
Line 28: Line 31:
| 4 || 18.3647684 || 18
| 4 || 18.3647684 || 18
|-  
|-  
| 5 || 28.224512 || 28
| 5 || 28.22451(26) || 28
|-  
|-  
| 6 || 39.8151475 || 40
| 6 || 39.81515(93) || 40
|-
|-
| 7 || 53.3444198 || 54
| 7 || 53.3444(37) || 54
|-
|-
| 8 || 68.5375488 || 70
| 8 || 68.538(18) || 70
|-
|-
| 9 || 85.8128384 || 88
| 9 || 85.813(85) || 88
|-
|-
| 10 || 105.775104 || 108
| 10 || 105.78(39) || 108
|}
|}


Line 57: Line 60:
Isothermal [[compressibility]]:
Isothermal [[compressibility]]:


:<math>\chi_T -1 = \frac{1}{k_BT} \left.\frac{\partial P^{CS}}{\partial \rho}\right\vert_{T} =  \frac{8\eta -2 \eta^2 }{(1-\eta)^4}</math>
:<math>\chi_T -1 = \frac{1}{k_BT} \left.\frac{\partial P^{CS}}{\partial \rho}\right\vert_{T} -1 =  \frac{8\eta -2 \eta^2 }{(1-\eta)^4}</math>


where <math>\eta</math> is the [[packing fraction]].
where <math>\eta</math> is the [[packing fraction]].
Line 63: Line 66:
Configurational [[Helmholtz energy function]]:
Configurational [[Helmholtz energy function]]:


:<math> \frac{ A_{ex}^{CS}}{k_B T}  = \frac{4 \eta - 3 \eta^2 }{(1-\eta)^2}</math>
:<math> \frac{ A_{ex}^{CS}}{N k_B T}  = \frac{4 \eta - 3 \eta^2 }{(1-\eta)^2}</math>


==The 'Percus-Yevick' derivation==
==The 'Percus-Yevick' derivation==
Line 71: Line 74:


The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100356a008 Yuhua Song, E. A. Mason, and Richard M. Stratt "Why does the Carnahan-Starling equation work so well?", Journal of Physical Chemistry '''93''' pp. 6916-6919 (1989)]</ref> ).
The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100356a008 Yuhua Song, E. A. Mason, and Richard M. Stratt "Why does the Carnahan-Starling equation work so well?", Journal of Physical Chemistry '''93''' pp. 6916-6919 (1989)]</ref> ).
== Kolafa correction ==
Jiri Kolafa produced a slight correction to the C-S EOS which results in improved accuracy <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4870524 Miguel Robles, Mariano López de Haro and Andrés Santos "Note: Equation of state and the freezing point in the hard-sphere model", Journal of Chemical Physics '''140''' 136101 (2014)]</ref>:
: <math>
Z =  \frac{ 1 + \eta + \eta^2 -  \frac{2}{3}(1+\eta) \eta^3 }{(1-\eta)^3 }.
</math>
== Liu correction ==
Hongqin Liu proposed a correction to the C-S EOS which improved accuracy by almost two order of magnitude <ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14357 Hongqin Liu "Carnahan Starling type equations of state for stable hard disk and hard sphere fluids", arXiv:2010.14357]</ref>:
: <math>
Z =  \frac{ 1 + \eta + \eta^2 -  \frac{8}{13}\eta^3 - \eta^4 + \frac{1}{2}\eta^5 }{(1-\eta)^3 }.
</math>


== See also ==  
== See also ==  
 
*[[Equations of state for hard spheres]]
*[[Kolafa-Labík-Malijevský equation of state]]
*[[Kolafa-Labík-Malijevský equation of state]]



Latest revision as of 15:25, 21 March 2023

The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is an approximate (but quite good) equation of state for the fluid phase of the hard sphere model in three dimensions. It is given by (Ref [1] Eqn. 10).

where:

The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is not applicable for packing fractions greater than 0.55 [2].

Virial expansion[edit]

It is interesting to compare the virial coefficients of the Carnahan-Starling equation of state (Eq. 7 of [1]) with the hard sphere virial coefficients in three dimensions (exact up to , and those of Clisby and McCoy [3]):

Clisby and McCoy
2 4 4
3 10 10
4 18.3647684 18
5 28.22451(26) 28
6 39.81515(93) 40
7 53.3444(37) 54
8 68.538(18) 70
9 85.813(85) 88
10 105.78(39) 108

Thermodynamic expressions[edit]

From the Carnahan-Starling equation for the fluid phase the following thermodynamic expressions can be derived (Ref [4] Eqs. 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8)

Pressure (compressibility):


Configurational chemical potential:

Isothermal compressibility:

where is the packing fraction.

Configurational Helmholtz energy function:

The 'Percus-Yevick' derivation[edit]

It is interesting to note (Ref [5] Eq. 6) that one can arrive at the Carnahan-Starling equation of state by adding two thirds of the exact solution of the Percus Yevick integral equation for hard spheres via the compressibility route, to one third via the pressure route, i.e.

The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. [6] ).

Kolafa correction[edit]

Jiri Kolafa produced a slight correction to the C-S EOS which results in improved accuracy [7]:

Liu correction[edit]

Hongqin Liu proposed a correction to the C-S EOS which improved accuracy by almost two order of magnitude [8]:

See also[edit]

References[edit]