Boyle's law: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added a little history.)
m (Changed reference to Cite format)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
==History==
==History==
Boyle's law is attributed to both [[Robert Boyle]] and to Edme Mariotte. However, it seems that it was originally  
Boyle's law is attributed to both [[Robert Boyle]] and to Edme Mariotte. However, it seems that it was originally  
proposed by Henry Power in 1661 (published in 1664, Ref. 1).
proposed by Henry Power in 1661 <ref>Henry Power "Experimental philosophy, in three books : containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis." Printed by T. Roycroft, for John Martin and James Allestry (1664)</ref>.
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Charles's law]]
*[[Charles's law]]
Line 11: Line 11:
*[[Equation of State: Ideal Gas | Ideal gas law]]
*[[Equation of State: Ideal Gas | Ideal gas law]]
==References==
==References==
#Henry Power "Experimental philosophy, in three books : containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis." Printed by T. Roycroft, for John Martin and James Allestry (1664)
<references/>
[[category: classical thermodynamics]]
[[category: classical thermodynamics]]

Latest revision as of 13:41, 20 December 2011

Boyle's law states that

where is the pressure, is the volume and is a constant. This holds true for an ideal gas.

History[edit]

Boyle's law is attributed to both Robert Boyle and to Edme Mariotte. However, it seems that it was originally proposed by Henry Power in 1661 [1].

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Henry Power "Experimental philosophy, in three books : containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis." Printed by T. Roycroft, for John Martin and James Allestry (1664)