Talk:Modified Lennard-Jones model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Regarding the coefficients <math>C_3</math> and <math>C_4</math> there is an interchange of signs between the original Broughton and Gilmer parameter set, and the recent Asano...") |
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the coefficients <math>C_3</math> and <math>C_4</math> there is an interchange of signs between the original Broughton and Gilmer parameter set, and the recent Asano and Fuchizaki work. I have yet to program this function to see whether this is indeed the case, or there has been a typographical error in one of the publications. --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 17:12, 7 November 2012 (CET) | Regarding the coefficients <math>C_3</math> and <math>C_4</math> there is an interchange of signs between the original Broughton and Gilmer parameter set, and the recent Asano and Fuchizaki work. I have yet to program this function to see whether this is indeed the case, or there has been a typographical error in one of the publications. --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 17:12, 7 November 2012 (CET) | ||
:Upon inspection it appears to be the case that BOTH <math>C_3</math> and <math>C_4</math> should be negative. --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 18:15, 7 November 2012 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:15, 7 November 2012
Regarding the coefficients and there is an interchange of signs between the original Broughton and Gilmer parameter set, and the recent Asano and Fuchizaki work. I have yet to program this function to see whether this is indeed the case, or there has been a typographical error in one of the publications. -- Carl McBride (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2012 (CET)
- Upon inspection it appears to be the case that BOTH and should be negative. -- Carl McBride (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2012 (CET)