Difference between revisions of "Talk:1-dimensional hard rods"

From SklogWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reply to 134.93.131.17)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
the derivation of the isobaric ensemble is mathematically WRONG!!!
 
the derivation of the isobaric ensemble is mathematically WRONG!!!
 
:Could you provide details? --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 15:11, 6 November 2009 (CET)
 
:Could you provide details? --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 15:11, 6 November 2009 (CET)
 +
:The book by Ziman is quite readable, but please consider the following references: [http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9610062 A. Drory at arXiv], Kierlik and Rosinberg ''J Stat Phys'' '''68''' 1037 (1992), Percus ''J Stat Phys'' '''28''' 67 (1982). And, please don't shout. --[[User:Dduque|Dduque]] 13:04, 10 November 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 13:04, 10 November 2009

the derivation of the isobaric ensemble is mathematically WRONG!!!

Could you provide details? -- Carl McBride (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2009 (CET)
The book by Ziman is quite readable, but please consider the following references: A. Drory at arXiv, Kierlik and Rosinberg J Stat Phys 68 1037 (1992), Percus J Stat Phys 28 67 (1982). And, please don't shout. --Dduque 13:04, 10 November 2009 (CET)