Ornstein-Zernike relation: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
*<math>g(r)</math> is the [[Pair distribution function | pair distribution function]].
*<math>g(r)</math> is the [[Pair distribution function | pair distribution function]].
*<math>\Phi(r)</math> is the [[Pair potential | pair potential]] acting between pairs.
*<math>\Phi(r)</math> is the [[Pair potential | pair potential]] acting between pairs.
*<math>h(1,2)</math> is the [[Total correlation function | total correlation function]] <math>h(1,2) \equiv  g(r) -1</math>.
*<math>h(1,2)</math> is the [[Total correlation function | total correlation function]].
*<math>c(1,2)</math> is the [[Direct correlation function | direct correlation function]].
*<math>c(1,2)</math> is the [[Direct correlation function | direct correlation function]].
*<math>\gamma (r)</math> is the [[Indirect correlation function | indirect]] (or ''series'' or  ''chain'') correlation function <math>\gamma (r) \equiv  h(r) - c(r)</math>.
*<math>\gamma (r)</math> is the [[Indirect correlation function | indirect]] (or ''series'' or  ''chain'') correlation function.
*<math>y(r_{12})</math> is the [[Cavity correlation function | cavity correlation function]]<math>y(r)  \equiv g(r) /e^{-\beta \Phi(r)}</math>
*<math>y(r_{12})</math> is the [[Cavity correlation function | cavity correlation function]].
*<math>B(r)</math> is the [[Closures | bridge]] function.
*<math>B(r)</math> is the [[Closures | bridge]] function.
*<math>\omega(r)</math> is the [[Thermal potential | thermal potential]], <math>\omega(r) \equiv \gamma(r) + B(r)</math>.
*<math>\omega(r)</math> is the [[Thermal potential | thermal potential]].
*<math>f(r)</math> is the [[Mayer f-function]], defined as <math>f(r) \equiv  e^{-\beta \Phi(r)} -1</math>.
*<math>f(r)</math> is the [[Mayer f-function]].





Revision as of 12:37, 28 February 2007

Notation:


The Ornstein-Zernike relation (OZ) integral equation is

where denotes a functional of . This relation is exact. This is complemented by the closure relation

Note that depends on , and depends on . Because of this must be determined self-consistently. This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems. (Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)

If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (Ref. 1Eq. 6)

In words, this equation (Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 107)

``...describes the fact that the total correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by , 
is due in part to the direct correlation between 1 and 2, represented by , but also to the indirect correlation,  
, propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."

Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, i.e.

(Note: the convolution operation written here as is more frequently written as ) This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of (here truncated at the fourth iteration):

etc. Diagrammatically this expression can be written as (Ref. 2):

where the bold lines connecting root points denote functions, the blobs denote functions. An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing particle labels. The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).

OZ equation in Fourier space

The OZ equation may be written in Fourier space as (Eq. 5 in Ref. 3):

The carets denote the three-dimensional Fourier transformed quantities which reduce explicitly to:


Note:


References

  1. L. S. Ornstein and F. Zernike "Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance", Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Amsterdam Proc. Sec. Sci. 17 pp. 793- (1914)
  2. James A. Given "Liquid-state methods for random media: Random sequential adsorption", Physical Review A 45 pp. 816 - 824 (1992)
  3. Der-Ming Duh and A. D. J. Haymet "Integral equation theory for uncharged liquids: The Lennard-Jones fluid and the bridge function", Journal of Chemical Physics 103 pp. 2625-2633 (1995)
  4. Hansen and MacDonald "Theory of Simple Liquids"