Monte Carlo in the microcanonical ensemble: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
Consider a system of <math> \left. N \right. </math> identical particles, with total energy <math> \left. H \right. </math> given by:
Consider a system of <math> \left. N \right. </math> identical particles, with total energy <math> \left. H \right. </math> given by:


: <math> H = \sum_{i=1}^{3N} \frac{p_i^2}{2m} + U \left( X^{3N} \right). </math>
: <math> H = \sum_{i=1}^{3N} \frac{p_i^2}{2m} + U \left( X^{3N} \right), </math>


where the first term on the right hand side is the [[Kinetic energy |kinetic energy]], whereas the second one is
where the first term on the right hand side is the [[Kinetic energy |kinetic energy]], whereas the second one is
the [[Potential energy | potential energy]] (a function of the positional coordinates)
the [[Potential energy | potential energy]] (a function of the positional coordinates).


Now, let us consider the system in a [[Microcanonical ensemble |microcanonical ensemble]];  
Now, let us consider the system in a [[Microcanonical ensemble |microcanonical ensemble]];  
Let <math> \left. E  \right. </math> be the total energy of the system (constrained in this ensemble)
let <math> \left. E  \right. </math> be the total energy of the system (constrained in this ensemble).


The probability, <math> \left. \Pi \right. </math>  of a given position configuration <math> \left. X^{3N} \right. </math>, with potential energy
The probability, <math> \left. \Pi \right. </math>  of a given position configuration <math> \left. X^{3N} \right. </math>, with potential energy
Line 20: Line 20:
where <math> \left. P^{3N} \right. </math> stands for the <math>3N</math> momenta, and
where <math> \left. P^{3N} \right. </math> stands for the <math>3N</math> momenta, and


: <math> \Delta E = E - U\left(X^{3N}\right) </math>
: <math> \Delta E = E - U\left(X^{3N}\right) </math>.


The Integral in the right hand side of Eq. 1 corresponds to the surface of a 3N-dimensional hyper-sphere of radius  
The Integral in the right hand side of Eq. 1 corresponds to the surface of a 3N-dimensional hyper-sphere of radius  

Revision as of 18:19, 28 February 2007

Integration of the kinetic degrees of freedom

Consider a system of identical particles, with total energy given by:

where the first term on the right hand side is the kinetic energy, whereas the second one is the potential energy (a function of the positional coordinates).

Now, let us consider the system in a microcanonical ensemble; let be the total energy of the system (constrained in this ensemble).

The probability, of a given position configuration , with potential energy can be written as:

 ; (Eq. 1)

where stands for the momenta, and

.

The Integral in the right hand side of Eq. 1 corresponds to the surface of a 3N-dimensional hyper-sphere of radius  ; therefore:

.

See Ref. 1 for an application of Monte Carlo simulation using this ensemble.

References

  1. N. G. Almarza and E. Enciso "Critical behavior of ionic solids" Physical Review E 64, 042501 (2001) (4 pages)