Modified Lennard-Jones model: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (typo)
(Added note that both C3 and C4 should be negative.)
Line 15: Line 15:
<math>C_4 = 0.083312 \epsilon</math>  
<math>C_4 = 0.083312 \epsilon</math>  
and <math>C_5 = 0.74689\epsilon</math>. These parametrs are chosen so that the function <math>\Phi_{12}(r)</math>, as well as the first derivative, is continuous both at <math>r = 2.3\sigma</math> and <math>r = 2.5\sigma</math>.
and <math>C_5 = 0.74689\epsilon</math>. These parametrs are chosen so that the function <math>\Phi_{12}(r)</math>, as well as the first derivative, is continuous both at <math>r = 2.3\sigma</math> and <math>r = 2.5\sigma</math>.
These parameters have recently been recalculated by Asano and Fuchizaki <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4764855  Yuta Asano and Kazuhiro Fuchizaki "Phase diagram of the modified Lennard-Jones system", Journal of Chemical Physics '''137''' 174502 (2012)]</ref>, leading to
These parameters have recently been recalculated with greater precision by Asano and Fuchizaki <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4764855  Yuta Asano and Kazuhiro Fuchizaki "Phase diagram of the modified Lennard-Jones system", Journal of Chemical Physics '''137''' 174502 (2012)]</ref>, leading to
<math>C_1 = 0.0163169237\epsilon</math>,  
<math>C_1 = 0.0163169237\epsilon</math>,  
<math>C_2 = 3136.5686  \epsilon</math>  
<math>C_2 = 3136.5686  \epsilon</math>  
<math>C_3 = 68.069 \epsilon</math>  
<math>C_3 = 68.069 \epsilon</math>  
<math>C_4 =  −0.0833111261\epsilon</math>  
<math>C_4 =  −0.0833111261\epsilon</math>  
and <math>C_5 = 0.746882273 \epsilon</math>.
and <math>C_5 = 0.746882273 \epsilon</math>. Note however, that it seems that '''both''' <math>C_3</math> and <math>C_4</math> should be negative for these parameters to work.
==References==
==References==  
<references/>
<references/>


[[category: models]]
[[category: models]]

Revision as of 19:18, 7 November 2012

The modified Lennard-Jones model is given by (Eq. 2 [1]):

where , and . These parametrs are chosen so that the function , as well as the first derivative, is continuous both at and . These parameters have recently been recalculated with greater precision by Asano and Fuchizaki [2], leading to , Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle C_4 = −0.0833111261\epsilon} and . Note however, that it seems that both and should be negative for these parameters to work.

References