Hyper-netted chain: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The HNC equation has a clear physical basis in the Kirkwood superposition approximation \cite{MP_1983_49_1495}.The hyper-netted chain approximation is obtained by omitting the elementary clusters, <math>E(r)</math>, in the exact convolution equation for <math>g(r)</math>. The  hyper-netted chain (HNC) approximation was developed almost simultaneously by various
The HNC equation has a clear physical basis in the Kirkwood superposition approximation (Ref. 1). The hyper-netted chain approximation is obtained by omitting the elementary clusters, <math>E(r)</math>, in the exact convolution equation for <math>g(r)</math>. The  hyper-netted chain (HNC) approximation was developed almost simultaneously by various
groups, namely: van Leeuwen, Groeneveld and de Boer, 1959 \cite{P_1959_25_0792}, Morita and Hiroike, 1960 \cite{PTP_1958_020_0920,PTP_1959_021_0361,PTP_1960_023_0829,PTP_1960_023_1003,PTP_1960_024_0317,PTP_1961_025_0537},
groups, namely: van Leeuwen, Groeneveld and de Boer, 1959 (Ref. 2). Morita and Hiroike, 1960 (Ref.s 3-8),
Rushbrooke, 1960 \cite{P_1960_26_0259}, Verlet, 1960 \cite{NC_1960_18_0077_nolotengo}, and Meeron, 1960 \cite{JMP_1960_01_00192}. The HNC omits the Bridge function, i.e. <math> B(r) =0 </math>, thus
Rushbrooke, 1960 (Ref. 9), Verlet, 1960 (Ref. 10), and Meeron, 1960 (Ref. 11). The HNC omits the Bridge function, i.e. <math> B(r) =0 </math>, thus
the  cavity correlation function becomes
the  cavity correlation function becomes
:<math>\ln y (r) =  h(r)  -c(r) \equiv \gamma (r)</math>
:<math>\ln y (r) =  h(r)  -c(r) \equiv \gamma (r)</math>
The HNC closure can be written as (5.7)
The HNC closure can be written as
:<math>f \left[ \gamma (r) \right] = e^{[-\beta \Phi (r) + \gamma (r)]} - \gamma (r) -1</math>
:<math>f \left[ \gamma (r) \right] = e^{[-\beta \Phi (r) + \gamma (r)]} - \gamma (r) -1</math>
or
or
:<math>c(r)= h(r) - \beta \Phi(r) - \ln {\rm g}(r)</math>
:<math>c\left(r\right)= h(r) - \beta \Phi(r) - \ln {\rm g}(r)</math>
or (Eq. 12 \cite{MP_1983_49_1495})
or (Eq. 12 Ref. 1)
:<math> c\left( r \right)= g(r) - \omega(r) </math>
:<math> c\left( r \right)= g(r) - \omega(r) </math>
The HNC approximation is well suited for long-range potentials, and in particular, Coulombic systems. For details of the numerical solution of the HNC for ionic systems see \cite{MP_1988_65_0599}.
The HNC approximation is well suited for long-range potentials, and in particular, Coulombic systems. For details of the numerical solution of the HNC for ionic systems (see Ref. 12).
==References==
==References==
#[MP_1983_49_1495]
#[P_1959_25_0792]
#[PTP_1958_020_0920]
#[PTP_1959_021_0361]
#[PTP_1960_023_0829]
#[PTP_1960_023_1003]
#[PTP_1960_024_0317]
#[PTP_1961_025_0537]
#[P_1960_26_0259]
#[NC_1960_18_0077_nolotengo]
#[JMP_1960_01_00192]
#[MP_1988_65_0599]

Revision as of 16:25, 19 February 2007

The HNC equation has a clear physical basis in the Kirkwood superposition approximation (Ref. 1). The hyper-netted chain approximation is obtained by omitting the elementary clusters, , in the exact convolution equation for . The hyper-netted chain (HNC) approximation was developed almost simultaneously by various groups, namely: van Leeuwen, Groeneveld and de Boer, 1959 (Ref. 2). Morita and Hiroike, 1960 (Ref.s 3-8), Rushbrooke, 1960 (Ref. 9), Verlet, 1960 (Ref. 10), and Meeron, 1960 (Ref. 11). The HNC omits the Bridge function, i.e. , thus the cavity correlation function becomes

The HNC closure can be written as

or

or (Eq. 12 Ref. 1)

The HNC approximation is well suited for long-range potentials, and in particular, Coulombic systems. For details of the numerical solution of the HNC for ionic systems (see Ref. 12).

References

  1. [MP_1983_49_1495]
  2. [P_1959_25_0792]
  3. [PTP_1958_020_0920]
  4. [PTP_1959_021_0361]
  5. [PTP_1960_023_0829]
  6. [PTP_1960_023_1003]
  7. [PTP_1960_024_0317]
  8. [PTP_1961_025_0537]
  9. [P_1960_26_0259]
  10. [NC_1960_18_0077_nolotengo]
  11. [JMP_1960_01_00192]
  12. [MP_1988_65_0599]