Ewald sum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00058-N Paul E. Smith and B. Montgomery Pettitt "Efficient Ewald electrostatic calculations for large systems", Computer Physics Communications '''91''' pp. 339-344 (1995)] | #[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00058-N Paul E. Smith and B. Montgomery Pettitt "Efficient Ewald electrostatic calculations for large systems", Computer Physics Communications '''91''' pp. 339-344 (1995)] | ||
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2206581 Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter "Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics", Journal of Chemical Physics '''124''' 234104 (2006)] | #[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2206581 Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter "Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics", Journal of Chemical Physics '''124''' 234104 (2006)] | ||
[[category: Computer simulation techniques]] | |||
Revision as of 16:12, 2 August 2007
References
- Paul Ewald "Die Berechnung Optischer und Electrostatischer Gitterpotentiale", Annalen der Physik 64 pp. 253-287 (1921)
- Paul E. Smith and B. Montgomery Pettitt "Efficient Ewald electrostatic calculations for large systems", Computer Physics Communications 91 pp. 339-344 (1995)
- Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter "Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 234104 (2006)