Heaviside step distribution: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
| Carl McBride (talk | contribs) No edit summary | Carl McBride (talk | contribs)  No edit summary | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| \end{array} \right. | \end{array} \right. | ||
| </math> | </math> | ||
| Note that other definitions exist at <math>H(0)</math>, for example <math>H(0)=1</math>. | |||
| In the famous [http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html Mathematica] computer | |||
| package   <math>H(0)</math> is unevaluated.  | |||
| ==Applications== | |||
| *[[Fourier analysis]] | |||
| ==Differentiating the Heaviside  distribution== | ==Differentiating the Heaviside  distribution== | ||
| At first glance things are hopeless: | At first glance things are hopeless: | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 30 May 2007
The Heaviside step distribution is defined by (Abramowitz and Stegun Eq. 29.1.3, p. 1020):
Note that other definitions exist at , for example . In the famous Mathematica computer package is unevaluated.
Applications
Differentiating the Heaviside distribution
At first glance things are hopeless:
however, lets define a less brutal jump in the form of a linear slope such that
in the limit this becomes the Heaviside function . However, lets differentiate first:
in the limit this is the Dirac delta distribution. Thus
- .