Ornstein-Zernike relation: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


The '''Ornstein-Zernike relation''' (OZ) integral equation is
The '''Ornstein-Zernike relation''' (OZ) integral equation is
:<math>h=h[c]</math>
:<math>h=h\left[c\right]</math>
where  <math>h[c]</math> denotes a functional of <math>c</math>. This relation is exact.
where  <math>h[c]</math> denotes a functional of <math>c</math>. This relation is exact.
This is complemented by the closure relation
This is complemented by the closure relation
:<math>c=c[h]</math>
:<math>c=c\left[h\right]</math>
Note that <math>h</math> depends on <math>c</math>, and <math>c</math> depends on <math>h</math>.
Note that <math>h</math> depends on <math>c</math>, and <math>c</math> depends on <math>h</math>.
Because of this <math>h</math> must be determined [[self-consistently]].
Because of this <math>h</math> must be determined [[self-consistently]].
Line 23: Line 23:
If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (\cite{KNAW_1914_17_0793} Eq. 6)
If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (\cite{KNAW_1914_17_0793} Eq. 6)


<math>\gamma ({\bf r}) \equiv  h({\bf r}) - c({\bf r}) = \rho \int  h({\bf r'})~c(|{\bf r} - {\bf r'}|) {\rm d}{\bf r'}</math>
<math>\gamma (r) \equiv  h(r) - c(r) = \rho \int  h(r')~c(|r - r'|) dr'</math>
In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)
In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)
  ``...describes the fact that the ''total'' correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by <math>h(1,2)</math>,  
  ``...describes the fact that the ''total'' correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by <math>h(1,2)</math>,  
  is due in part to the ''direct'' correlation between 1 and 2, represented by <math>c(1,2)</math>, but also to the ''indirect'' correlation,   
  is due in part to the ''direct'' correlation between 1 and 2, represented by <math>c(1,2)</math>, but also to the ''indirect'' correlation,   
<math>\gamma (r)</math>, propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."
:<math>\gamma (r)</math>, propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."


Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, ''i.e.''
Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, ''i.e.''
<math>h  \equiv c  + \rho h\otimes c </math>
:<math>h  \equiv c  + \rho h\otimes c </math>


(Note: the convolution operation written here as $ \otimes$ is more frequently written as $*$)\\
(Note: the convolution operation written here as <math>\otimes</math> is more frequently written as <math>*</math>)
This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of $h({\bf r})$
This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of <math>h(r)</math>
(here truncated at the fourth iteration):
(here truncated at the fourth iteration):
\begin{eqnarray*}
 
h({\bf r}) = c({\bf r}&+& \rho \int c(|{\bf r} - {\bf r'}|)  c({\bf r'}{\rm d}{\bf r'} \\
<math>h(r) = c(r)  + \rho \int c(|r - r'|)  c(r')  dr'  
&+& \rho^2  \int \int  c(|{\bf r} - {\bf r'}|)  c(|{\bf r'} - {\bf r''}|)  c({\bf r''}{\rm d}{\bf r''}{\rm d}{\bf r'} \\
+ \rho^2  \int \int  c(|r - r'|)  c(|r' - r''|)  c(r'')  dr''dr'
&+& \rho^3 \int\int\int  c(|{\bf r} - {\bf r'}|) c(|{\bf r'} - {\bf r''}|) c(|{\bf r''} - {\bf r'''}|) c({\bf r'''}{\rm d}{\bf r'''}{\rm d}{\bf r''}{\rm d}{\bf r'}\\
+ \rho^3 \int\int\int  c(|r - r'|) c(|r' - r''|) c(|r'' - r'''|) c(r''')  dr'''dr''dr'
&+& \rho^4 \int \int\int\int  c(|{\bf r} - {\bf r'}|) c(|{\bf r'} - {\bf r''}|) c(|{\bf r''} - {\bf r'''}|) c(|{\bf r'''} - {\bf r''''}|) h({\bf r''''}{\rm d}{\bf r''''} {\rm d}{\bf r'''}{\rm d}{\bf r''}{\rm d}{\bf r'}
+ \rho^4 \int \int\int\int  c(|r - r'|) c(|r' - r''|) c(|r'' - r'''|) c(|r''' - r''''|) h(r'''')  dr'''' dr'''dr''dr'</math>
\end{eqnarray*}
 
{\it etc.}\\
''etc.''
Diagrammatically this expression can be written as  \cite{PRA_1992_45_000816}:
Diagrammatically this expression can be written as  \cite{PRA_1992_45_000816}:
\begin{figure}[H]
\begin{figure}[H]
Line 49: Line 49:
\end{figure}
\end{figure}
\noindent
\noindent
where the bold lines connecting root points denote $c$ functions, the blobs denote $h$ functions.
where the bold lines connecting root points denote <math>c</math> functions, the blobs denote <math>h</math> functions.
An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root
An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root
point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing
point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing
particle labels.\\
particle labels.
The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation  
The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation  
of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).
of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).
==References==

Revision as of 16:21, 20 February 2007

Notation:

  • is the pair distribution function.
  • is the pair potential acting between pairs.
  • is the total correlation function .
  • is the direct correlation function.
  • is the indirect (or series or chain) correlation function .
  • is the cavity correlation function
  • is the bridge function.
  • is the thermal potential, .
  • is the [[Mayer -function]], defined as .


The Ornstein-Zernike relation (OZ) integral equation is

where denotes a functional of . This relation is exact. This is complemented by the closure relation

Note that depends on , and depends on . Because of this must be determined self-consistently. This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems. (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)

If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (\cite{KNAW_1914_17_0793} Eq. 6)

In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)

``...describes the fact that the total correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by , 
is due in part to the direct correlation between 1 and 2, represented by , but also to the indirect correlation,  
, propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."

Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, i.e.

(Note: the convolution operation written here as is more frequently written as ) This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of (here truncated at the fourth iteration):

etc. Diagrammatically this expression can be written as \cite{PRA_1992_45_000816}: \begin{figure}[H] \begin{center} \includegraphics[clip,height=30pt,width=350pt]{oz_diag.eps} \end{center} \end{figure} \noindent where the bold lines connecting root points denote functions, the blobs denote functions. An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing particle labels. The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).

References