Editing Wikis and Science 2.0
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Here is some interesting reading pertaining to wiki, with particular emphasis on their relation to science (in chronological order) | Here is some interesting reading pertaining to wiki, with particular emphasis on their relation to science (in chronological order): | ||
==2005== | ==2005== | ||
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)] | *[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)] | ||
<blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote> | ||
==2007== | ==2007== | ||
*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)] | *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)] | ||
*[http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140 Dennis M. Wilkinson, Bernardo A. Huberman "Assessing the Value of Coooperation in Wikipedia", arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140] | *[http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140 Dennis M. Wilkinson, Bernardo A. Huberman "Assessing the Value of Coooperation in Wikipedia", arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140] | ||
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news070226-6 Philip Ball "The more, the wikier", Nature news 27 February | *[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news070226-6 Philip Ball "The more, the wikier", Nature news 27 February 2007] | ||
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0307-231 Brandon Keim "WikiMedia", Nature Medicine '''13''' pp. 231-233 (2007)] | *[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0307-231 Brandon Keim "WikiMedia", Nature Medicine '''13''' pp. 231-233 (2007)] | ||
<blockquote>"Uneasy with information websites policed by people with little expertise, scientists are creating their own online encyclopedias"</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Uneasy with information websites policed by people with little expertise, scientists are creating their own online encyclopedias"</blockquote> | ||
Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
==2008== | ==2008== | ||
*[http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/wikipedia-community-publishing.html Tim O’Reilly "Wikipedia: A community of editors or a community of authors?", January 3 | *[http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/wikipedia-community-publishing.html Tim O’Reilly "Wikipedia: A community of editors or a community of authors?", January 3 2008] | ||
<blockquote>"This is why publishers should be studying Wikipedia (and YouTube, and Google) -- because they are all showing us the new face of publishing. At their heart, they involve new means of content creation yes, but more profoundly, they involve new means of curation. Wikipedia creates a context within which authors can exercise their skills, displaying their knowledge and their passion. Yes, it allows for collaborative creation, and that's good."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"This is why publishers should be studying [http://www.research-service.com/custom-essay-writing.html custom essay] Wikipedia (and YouTube, and Google) -- because they are all showing us the new face of publishing. At their heart, they involve new means of content creation yes, but more profoundly, they involve new means of curation. Wikipedia creates a context within which authors can exercise their skills, displaying their knowledge and their passion. Yes, it allows for collaborative creation, and that's good."</blockquote> | ||
*[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk&page=1 M. Mitchell Waldrop "Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk?", Scientific American January 9 (2008)] (see also: Scientific American May Vol. 298 Issue 5 pp. 68-73 (2008)) | *[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk&page=1 M. Mitchell Waldrop "Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk?", Scientific American January 9 (2008)] (see also: Scientific American May Vol. 298 Issue 5 pp. 68-73 (2008)) | ||
<blockquote>"...Web-based "Science 2.0" is not only more collegial than the traditional variety, but considerably more productive."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"...Web-based "Science 2.0" is not only more collegial than the traditional variety, but considerably more productive."</blockquote> | ||
Line 48: | Line 46: | ||
*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] | *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] | ||
<blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> | ||
*[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] | *[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] | ||
[[category: miscellaneous]] | [[category: miscellaneous]] |