Editing Wikis and Science 2.0
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] | *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] | ||
<blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> | ||
*[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] | *[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] | ||
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)] | *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)] | ||
Line 56: | Line 54: | ||
<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote> | ||
<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote> | ||
==2010== | ==2010== | ||
*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010] | *[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010] |