Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| *[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)] | | *[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)] |
| <blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote> | | <blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote> |
| ==2006==
| |
| * Jane Klobas " Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration", Woodhead Publishing Limited (2006) ISBN 978-1-84334-178-9
| |
| ==2007== | | ==2007== |
| *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)] | | *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)] |
Line 48: |
Line 46: |
| *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] | | *[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)] |
| <blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> | | <blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote> |
| *[http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2009summer/article6.html John B. Stafford "Scientists built the web. Do they love web 2.0?", Stanford Medicine (Summer 2009)]
| |
| <blockquote>"And as these services have become household names, a constellation of applications for scientists started to gather under a “Science 2.0” banner: video journals and wikis for sharing protocols, and even social networks for researchers along the lines of Facebook. Their aim is to make scientific collaboration as easy as sharing videos of trips home from the dentist. Not many scientists are biting, though."</blockquote>
| |
| *[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] | | *[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).] |
| *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)] | | *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)] |
Line 58: |
Line 54: |
|
| |
|
| ==2010== | | ==2010== |
| *[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010]
| |
| <blockquote>"The next generation of PIs is already establishing new behaviors. They feel comfortable blogging, using social media tools, and using wikis to advance their research." (Adam Bly) </blockquote>
| |
| *[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]
| |
| <blockquote>"...some researchers regard blogs, wikis and other novel forms of communication as a waste of time or even dangerous."</blockquote>
| |
| <blockquote>"We found that current levels of take-up are relatively low, with 13% of respondents using such tools frequently (once a week or more), 45% using them occasionally, and 39% using them not at all."</blockquote>
| |
| <blockquote>"...few services have yet achieved the critical mass needed to achieve the positive network effects that stimulate pervasive use by particular communities."</blockquote>
| |
| *[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)] | | *[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)] |
| <blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote> | | <blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote> |
| ==2011==
| |
| *Michael Nielsen "Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science", Princeton University Press (2011) ISBN 9780691148908
| |
| p. 176
| |
| <blockquote>"'''Science Wikis''' ...to provide a single, centralized reference describing all the latest research... ...a sort of rapidly evolving, constantly updated super-textbook. ...the potential to go far beyond a textbook: it would be infinitely extensible and modifiable, capable of conveying material ranging from simple introductions of key concepts all the way up to detailed explanations of the latest research reults..."</blockquote>
| |
| p. 179
| |
| <blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>
| |
| *[http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Phys_Sci_case_study_full_report.pdf Eric T. Meyer, Monica Bulger, Avgousta Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, Lucy Power, Peter Williams, Will Venters, Melissa Terras, Sally Wyatt "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery", RIN, Institute of Physics (IOP), Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP) and Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) December 2011] p. 28
| |
| <blockquote>"Developments in web 2.0 technologies have also affected
| |
| communications. While static websites and emails predated
| |
| the web within particle physics, wiki pages provide a much
| |
| more interactive element to their collaboration and make
| |
| them more interconnected. All participants indicated that
| |
| the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication
| |
| within the community."</blockquote>
| |
| ==2012==
| |
| *[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all Thomas Lin "Cracking Open the Scientific Process", The New York Times January 16, 2012]
| |
| <blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>
| |
| ==2014==
| |
| * [http://divulgauned.es/el-formato-wiki-tiene-mucho-potencial-frente-a-libros-de-texto-en-papel/ Carl McBride "El formato wiki tiene mucho potencial frente a libros de texto en papel", divulgaUNED, 31 March (2014)]
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| [[category: miscellaneous]] | | [[category: miscellaneous]] |