Editing User talk:JuanManuel
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Dear JuanManuel, I have added the [http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3439 wikiFactor] of Scholarpedia. It is fairly easy to calculate, being very similar to the | Dear JuanManuel, I have added the [http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3439 wikiFactor] of Scholarpedia. It is fairly easy to calculate, being very similar to the | ||
Hirsch ''h'' index (with a factor of 1000); looking at the [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:PopularPages&limit=100&offset=0 Popular pages] of Scholarpedia one can see that (at the moment) the 51st mos popular page has had 52,700 views (which is >51,000), whilst the 52nd most popular page has <52,000 views, thus the wikiFactor of Scholarpedia (again, at the moment) is 51. The people at [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WikiFactor RationalWiki] have made a rather good page explaining the wikiFactor. All the best --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 10:43, 10 February 2011 (CET) | Hirsch ''h'' index (with a factor of 1000); looking at the [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:PopularPages&limit=100&offset=0 Popular pages] of Scholarpedia one can see that (at the moment) the 51st mos popular page has had 52,700 views (which is >51,000), whilst the 52nd most popular page has <52,000 views, thus the wikiFactor of Scholarpedia (again, at the moment) is 51. The people at [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WikiFactor RationalWiki] have made a rather good page explaining the wikiFactor. All the best --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 10:43, 10 February 2011 (CET) | ||