Talk:Boltzmann distribution: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (small change)
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like
but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like


:<math> f(E) \propto \Omega(E) \exp \left[ - E/k_B T \right] </math>, with
:<math> f(E) \propto \Omega(E) \exp \left[ - E/k_B T \right] </math>, where
<math> \Omega \left( E \right) </math> is the degeneracy of the energy <math> E </math>.
<math> \Omega \left( E \right) </math> is the degeneracy of the energy <math> E </math>.



Revision as of 13:53, 17 July 2008

I think that the current definition of Boltzmann distribution is misleading. The probability of a microsate, say , is . but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like

, where

is the degeneracy of the energy .

therefor

.

--Noe 10:32, 17 July 2008 (CEST)