Editing Lennard-Jones model

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 72: Line 72:


==Vapor-liquid equilibrium==
==Vapor-liquid equilibrium==
The vapor-liquid equilibrium of the Lennard-Jones potential has been studied more than 45 times in the literature. Several of these data sets were found to have gross deviations to an entity of data sets, which is both thermodynamically consistent and in good mutual agreement <ref name="Stephan2019">[https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00620  Simon Stephan, Monika Thol, Jadran Vrabec, and Hans Hasse "Thermophysical Properties of the Lennard-Jones Fluid: Database and Data Assessment", Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling '''59, 10''' pp. 4248–4265 (2019)]</ref>. The mutual agreement of these data sets was found to be approximately <math>\pm 1%</math> for the vapor pressure, <math>\pm 0.75%</math> for the enthalpy of vaporization, <math>\pm 0.2%</math> for the saturated liquid density, and <math>\pm 1%</math> for the saturated vapor density <ref name="Stephan2019">[https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00620  Simon Stephan, Monika Thol, Jadran Vrabec, and Hans Hasse "Thermophysical Properties of the Lennard-Jones Fluid: Database and Data Assessment", Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling '''59, 10''' pp. 4248–4265 (2019)]</ref>.
The vapor-liquid equilibrium of the Lennard-Jones potential has been studied 45 times <ref name="Stephan2019">[https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00620  Simon Stephan, Monika Thol, Jadran Vrabec, and Hans Hasse "Thermophysical Properties of the Lennard-Jones Fluid: Database and Data Assessment", Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling '''59, 10''' pp. 4248–4265 (2019)]</ref>. Several of these data sets were found to have gross deviations to an entity of data sets, which is both thermodynamically consistent and in good mutual agreement. The mutual agreement of these data sets was found to be approximately <math>\pm 1%</math> for the vapor pressure, <math>\pm 0.75%</math> for the enthalpy of vaporization, <math>\pm 0.2%</math> for the saturated liquid density, and <math>\pm 1%</math> for the saturated vapor density <ref name="Stephan2019">[https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00620  Simon Stephan, Monika Thol, Jadran Vrabec, and Hans Hasse "Thermophysical Properties of the Lennard-Jones Fluid: Database and Data Assessment", Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling '''59, 10''' pp. 4248–4265 (2019)]</ref>.
 
:<math>\ln p^s = n_1  T + \frac{n_2}{T} + \frac{n_3}{T^{n_4}} </math>  with    <math> n_i =[ 1.156551, -4.431519, -0.423028, 2.638743 ] </math>
:<math>\Big(\frac{\rho'}{\rho_\mathrm{c}}\Big) = 1 +  \sum_{i=1}^{5} n_i\, \Big(1 - \frac{T}{T_\mathrm{c}} \Big)^{t_i}  </math>
:<math>\ln \Big(\frac{\rho''}{\rho_\mathrm{c}}\Big) = \sum_{i=1}^{5} n_i\, \Big(1 - \frac{T}{T_\mathrm{c}} \Big)^{t_i} </math>
:<math>\Delta h_v = \sum_{i=1}^{4} n_i\, (T_\mathrm{c} - T)^{t_i}  </math>
 
The numerical values of the parameters ni and $t_i$ are
 
<math> {} </math>
<math> {} </math>
<math> {} </math>
 
1  1.341700 0.327140 −8.135822 1.651685 6.456728 0.411342
2  2.075332 0.958759 −102.919110 43.469214 2.700099 0.460416
3  −2.123475 1.645654 −3.037979 0.462877 −3.073573 2.350953
4  0.328998 17.000001 −44.381841 11.500462 3.149052 5.017010
5            1.386131 2.400858 −34.55892948 5.394370


:<math>\ln p^s = n_1  T + \frac{n_2}{T} + \frac{n_3}{T^{n_4}} ~~  \mathrm{with} ~~ n_i =[ 1.156551, -4.431519, -0.423028, 2.638743 ]  </math> 
:<math>\Big(\frac{\rho'}{\rho_\mathrm{c}}\Big) = 1 +  \sum_{i=1}^{5} n_i\, \Big(1 - \frac{T}{T_\mathrm{c}} \Big)^{t_i} ~~  \mathrm{with}~~ n_i = [1.3417, 2.075332, -2.123475, 0.328998, 1.386131] ~~\& ~~ t_i = [0.32714, 0.958759, 1.645654, 17.000001, 2.400858] </math>
:<math>\ln \Big(\frac{\rho''}{\rho_\mathrm{c}}\Big) = \sum_{i=1}^{5} n_i\, \Big(1 - \frac{T}{T_\mathrm{c}} \Big)^{t_i} ~~  \mathrm{with}~~ n_i = [-8.135822, -102.91911, -3.037979, -44.381841, -34.55892948]  ~~\& ~~ t_i = [1.651685, 43.469214, 0.462877, 11.500462, 5.39437] </math>
:<math>\Delta h_v = \sum_{i=1}^{4} n_i\, (T_\mathrm{c} - T)^{t_i} ~~  \mathrm{with} ~~ n_i = [6.456728, 2.700099, -3.073573, 3.149052 ]  ~~\& ~~ t_i = [0.411342, 0.460416, 2.350953, 5.01701 ]  </math>


==Melting line==
==Melting line==
Line 114: Line 127:
The Lennard-Jones model is also used in [[Perturbation theory |perturbation theories]], for example see: [[Weeks-Chandler-Andersen perturbation theory]].
The Lennard-Jones model is also used in [[Perturbation theory |perturbation theories]], for example see: [[Weeks-Chandler-Andersen perturbation theory]].
== Approximations in simulation: truncation and shifting ==
== Approximations in simulation: truncation and shifting ==
The Lennard-Jones model is often used with a cutoff radius of <math>2.5 \sigma</math>, beyond which <math> \Phi_{12}(r)</math> is set to zero. Setting the well depth <math> \epsilon </math> to be 1 in the potential on arrives at <math> \Phi_{12}(r)\simeq  -0.0163</math>, i.e. at this distance the potential is at less than 2% of the well depth. For an analysis of the effect of this cutoff on the melting line see the work of Mastny and  de Pablo  <ref name="Mastny"></ref> and of Ahmed and Sadus <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3481102  Alauddin Ahmed  and Richard J. Sadus "Effect of potential truncations and shifts on the solid-liquid phase coexistence of Lennard-Jones fluids", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 124515 (2010)]</ref>. See Panagiotopoulos for critical parameters <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01458815 A. Z. Panagiotopoulos "Molecular simulation of phase coexistence: Finite-size effects and determination of critical parameters for two- and three-dimensional Lennard-Jones fluids", International Journal of Thermophysics '''15''' pp. 1057-1072 (1994)]</ref>. See Pártay for the ground state structure <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CP02923C Lívia B. Pártay,  Christoph Ortner,  Albert P. Bartók,  Chris J. Pickard  and  Gábor Csányi "Polytypism in the ground state structure of the Lennard-Jonesium", Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics '''19''' 19369 (2017)]</ref>. It has recently been suggested that a truncated and shifted force cutoff of <math>1.5 \sigma</math> can be used under certain conditions <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3558787 Søren Toxvaerd and Jeppe C. Dyre "Communication: Shifted forces in molecular dynamics", Journal of Chemical Physics '''134''' 081102 (2011)]</ref>. In order to avoid any discontinuity, a piecewise continuous version, known as the  [[modified Lennard-Jones model]], was developed.
The Lennard-Jones model is often used with a cutoff radius of <math>2.5 \sigma</math>, beyond which <math> \Phi_{12}(r)</math> is set to zero. Setting the well depth <math> \epsilon </math> to be 1 in the potential on arrives at <math> \Phi_{12}(r)\simeq  -0.0163</math>, i.e. at this distance the potential is at less than 2% of the well depth. For an analysis of the effect of this cutoff on the melting line see the work of Mastny and  de Pablo  <ref name="Mastny"></ref> and of Ahmed and Sadus <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3481102  Alauddin Ahmed  and Richard J. Sadus "Effect of potential truncations and shifts on the solid-liquid phase coexistence of Lennard-Jones fluids", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 124515 (2010)]</ref>. See Panagiotopoulos for critical parameters <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01458815 A. Z. Panagiotopoulos "Molecular simulation of phase coexistence: Finite-size effects and determination of critical parameters for two- and three-dimensional Lennard-Jones fluids", International Journal of Thermophysics '''15''' pp. 1057-1072 (1994)]</ref>. It has recently been suggested that a truncated and shifted force cutoff of <math>1.5 \sigma</math> can be used under certain conditions <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3558787 Søren Toxvaerd and Jeppe C. Dyre "Communication: Shifted forces in molecular dynamics", Journal of Chemical Physics '''134''' 081102 (2011)]</ref>. In order to avoid any discontinuity, a piecewise continuous version, known as the  [[modified Lennard-Jones model]], was developed.
 
== Cutoff Lennard-Jones potential==
== Cutoff Lennard-Jones potential==
The cutoff Lennard-Jones potential is given by (Eq. 2 in <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1504  Spotswood D. Stoddard and Joseph Ford "Numerical Experiments on the Stochastic Behavior of a Lennard-Jones Gas System", Physical Review A '''8''' pp. 1504-1512 (1973)]</ref>):
The cutoff Lennard-Jones potential is given by (Eq. 2 in <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1504  Spotswood D. Stoddard and Joseph Ford "Numerical Experiments on the Stochastic Behavior of a Lennard-Jones Gas System", Physical Review A '''8''' pp. 1504-1512 (1973)]</ref>):
Please note that all contributions to SklogWiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike (see SklogWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)