Editing Gibbs-Duhem integration

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
The so-called '''Gibbs-Duhem integration''' refers  to a number of methods that couple
CURRENTLY THIS ARTICLE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
molecular [[Computer simulation techniques |simulation techniques]]  with [[Thermodynamic relations |thermodynamic equations]] in order to draw
== History ==
[[Computation of phase equilibria | phase coexistence]] lines. The original method was proposed by David Kofke <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100881 David A. Kofke,  "Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation", Molecular Physics  '''78'''  pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)]</ref>
The so-called Gibbs-Duhem Integration referes to a number of methods that couple
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.465023 David A. Kofke,  "Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line",  Journal of Chemical Physics  '''98''' pp. 4149-4162 (1993)]</ref>.
molecular simulation techniques with thermodynamic equations in order to draw
phase coexistence lines.
 
The method was proposed by Kofke (Ref 1-2).


== Basic Features ==
== Basic Features ==


Consider two thermodynamic phases: <math> a </math> and <math> b  </math>,  at thermodynamic equilibrium at certain conditions. Thermodynamic equilibrium implies:
Consider two thermodynamic phases: <math> a </math> and <math> b  </math>,  at thermodynamic equilibrium at certain conditions.
The thermodynamic equilibrium implies:


* Equal [[temperature]] in both phases: <math> T = T_{a} = T_{b} </math>, i.e. thermal equilibrium.
* Equal temperature in both phases: <math> T = T_{a} = T_{b} </math>, i.e. thermal equilbirum.
* Equal [[pressure]] in both phases <math> p = p_{a} = p_{b} </math>, i.e. mechanical equilibrium.
* Equal pressure in both phases <math> p = p_{a} = p_{b} </math>, i.e. mechanical equilbrium.
* Equal [[chemical potential]]s for the components <math> \mu_i = \mu_{ia} = \mu_{ib} </math>, i.e. ''material'' equilibrium.
* Equal chemical potentials for the components <math> \mu_i = \mu_{ia} = \mu_{ib} </math>, i.e. ''material'' equilibrium.


In addition, if one is  dealing with a statistical mechanical [[models |model]], having certain parameters that can be represented as <math> \lambda </math>, then the
In addition if we are dealing with a statistical mechanics model, with certain parameters that we can represent as <math> \lambda </math> , the
model should be the same in both phases.
model should be the same in both phases.


Line 27: Line 31:


where
where
* <math> \beta := 1/k_B T </math>, where <math> k_B </math> is the [[Boltzmann constant]]
* <math> \beta = 1/k_B T </math>, where <math> k_B </math> is the [[Boltzmann constant]]
When a differential change of the conditions is performed one will have, for any phase:
When a differential change of the conditions is performed we wil have for any phase:


: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) = \left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \beta} \right]_{\beta p,\lambda} d \beta +
: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) = \left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \beta} \right]_{\beta p,\lambda} d \beta +
Line 35: Line 39:
</math>  
</math>  


Taking into account that <math> \mu </math> is the [[Gibbs energy function]] per particle
Taking into account that <math> \mu </math> is the [[Gibbs energy function|Gibbs free energy]] per particle
: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) =  \frac{E}{N}  d \beta +  \frac{ V }{N } d (\beta p)  +  
: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) =  \frac{E}{N}  d \beta +  \frac{ V }{N } d (\beta p)  +  
\left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \lambda} \right]_{\beta,\beta p} d \lambda.
\left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \lambda} \right]_{\beta,\beta p} d \lambda.
</math>  
</math>  
where:
* <math> \left. E \right. </math> is the [[internal energy]] (sometimes written as <math>U</math>).
* <math> \left. V \right. </math> is the volume
* <math> \left. N \right. </math> is the number of particles
<math> \left. \right. E, V </math> are the mean values of the energy and volume for a system of <math> \left. N \right. </math> particles
in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble


Let us use a bar to design quantities divided by the number of particles: e.g. <math> \bar{E} = E/N; \bar{V} = V/N </math>;
Let us use a bar to design quantities divided by the number of particles: e.g. <math> \bar{E} = E/N; \bar{V} = V/N </math>;
and taking into account the definition:
and taking into account the definition:


: <math> \bar{L} \equiv \left[ \frac {\partial (\beta \mu )}{\partial \lambda }\right]_{\beta,\beta p} </math>
: <math> \bar{L} \equiv \frac{1}{N} \left[ \frac {\partial (\beta \mu )}{\partial \lambda }\right]_{\beta,\beta p} </math>


Again, let us suppose that we have a phase coexistence at a point given by <math>\left[ \beta_0, (\beta p)_0, \lambda_0 \right]</math> and that
Again, let us suppose that we have a phase coexistence at a point given by <math>\left[ \beta_0, (\beta p)_0, \lambda_0 \right]</math> and that
Line 63: Line 57:
constrained to fulfill:
constrained to fulfill:


:<math>  \left( \Delta  \bar{E} \right) d  \beta + \left( \Delta \bar{V} \right) d (\beta p) + \left(\Delta  \bar{L} \right) d \lambda = 0 </math>
<math>  \left( \Delta  \bar{E} \right) d  \beta + \left( \Delta \bar{V} \right) d (\beta p) + \left(\Delta  \bar{L} \right) d \lambda = 0 </math>


where for any property  <math> X </math> we can define: <math> \Delta X \equiv X_a - X_b </math> (i.e. the difference between the values of the property in the phases).
whrere for any porperty <math> X </math> we can define: <math> \Delta X \equiv X_a - X_b </math> (i.e. the difference between the values of the property in the phases).
Taking a path with, for instance constant <math> \beta </math>, the coexistence line will  follow the trajectory produced by the solution of the
Taking a path with, for instance constante <math> \beta </math>, the coexistence line will  follow the trajectory produced by the solution of the
differential equation:
differential equation:


:<math> d(\beta p) = - \frac{ \Delta \bar{L} }{\Delta \bar{V} } d \lambda. </math> (Eq. 1)
<math> d(\beta p) = - \frac{ \Delta \bar{L} }{\Delta \bar{V} } d \lambda. </math>
 
The Gibbs-Duhem integration technique, for this example, will be a numerical procedure covering the following tasks:
 
* Computer simulation (for instance using [[Metropolis Monte Carlo]] in the [[Isothermal-isobaric ensemble |NpT ensemble]]) runs to estimate the values of <math> \bar{L}, \bar{V} </math> for both
phases at given values of <math> [\beta, \beta p,  \lambda ] </math>.
 
* A procedure to solve numerically the differential equation  (Eq.1)
 
== Peculiarities of the method (Warnings) ==
 
* A good initial point must be known to start the procedure (See <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137705      A. van 't Hof, S. W. de Leeuw, and C. J. Peters "Computing the starting state for Gibbs-Duhem integration", Journal of Chemical Physics  '''124''' 054905 (2006)]</ref> and [[computation of phase equilibria]]).


* The ''integrand'' of the differential equation is computed with some numerical uncertainty
TO BE CONTINUED
 
* Care must be taken to reduce (and estimate) possible departures from the correct coexistence lines


== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100881 David A. Kofke, Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation, Mol. Phys. '''78''' , pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)]
'''Related reading'''
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.465023 David A. Kofke, Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line, J. Chem. Phys. '''98''' ,pp. 4149-4162 (1993) ]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137706      A. van 't Hof, C. J. Peters, and S. W. de Leeuw "An advanced Gibbs-Duhem integration method: Theory and applications", Journal of Chemical Physics '''124''' 054906 (2006)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3486090 Gerassimos Orkoulas "Communication: Tracing phase boundaries via molecular simulation: An alternative to the Gibbs–Duhem integration method", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 111104 (2010)]
 
[[category: computer simulation techniques]]
Please note that all contributions to SklogWiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike (see SklogWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)