Mean field models: Difference between revisions
(Completed solution, section added.) |
m (Added link to Curie's_law) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to | Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to | ||
:<math> U = - J n \sum_i^N S_i \bar{s} , </math> | :<math> U = - J n \sum_i^N S_i \bar{s} , </math> | ||
as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism: the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength | as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism (see [[Curie's_law]]): the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength | ||
:<math>H= J n \bar{s}.</math> | :<math>H= J n \bar{s}.</math> | ||
The magnetization of the Langevin theory is | The magnetization of the Langevin theory is | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 3 May 2010
A mean field model, or a mean field solution of a model, is an approximation to the actual solution of a model in statistical physics. The model is made exactly solvable by treating the effect of all other particles on a given one as a mean field (hence its name). It appear in different forms and different contexts, but all mean field models have this feature in common.
Mean field solution of the Ising model
A well-known mean field solution of the Ising model, known as the Bragg-Williams approximation goes as follows. From the original Hamiltonian,
suppose we may approximate
where is the number of neighbors of site Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle i} (e.g. 4 in a 2-D square lattice), and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s}} is the (unknown) magnetization:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s}=\frac{1}{N} \sum_i S_i . }
Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle U = - J n \sum_i^N S_i \bar{s} , }
as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism (see Curie's_law): the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle H= J n \bar{s}.}
The magnetization of the Langevin theory is
Therefore:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s} = \tanh(J n\bar{s}/k_B T). }
This is a self-consistent expression for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s}} . There exists a critical temperature, defined by
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle k_B T_c= J n .}
At temperatures higher than this value the only solution is Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s}=0} . Below it, however, this solution becomes unstable (it corresponds to a maximum in energy), whereas two others are stable. Slightly below Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T_c} ,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{s} =\pm\sqrt{3\left(1 - \frac{T}{T_c}\right)}. }
General discussion
The solution obtained shares a number of features with any other mean field approximation:
- It largely ignores geometry, which may be important in some cases. In particular, it reduces the lattice details to just the number of neighbours.
- As a consequence, it may predict phase transitions where none are found: the 1-D ising model Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle n=2} is known to lack any phase transition (at finite temperature)
- In general, the theory underestimates fluctuations
- It also leads to classical critical exponents, like the Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left(1 - \frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{1/2}} decay above. In 3-D, the magnetization follows a power law with a different exponent.
- Nevertheless, above a certain space dimension the critical exponents are correct. This dimension is 4 for the Ising model, as predicted by a self-consistency requirement due to E.M. Lipfshitz (similar ones are due to Peierls and L.D. Landau)