Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{welcome|JuanManuel|Carl McBride}} | | {{welcome|JuanManuel|Carl McBride}} |
| ==wikiFactor of Scholarpedia==
| |
| Dear JuanManuel, I have added the [http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3439 wikiFactor] of Scholarpedia. It is fairly easy to calculate, being very similar to the
| |
| Hirsch ''h'' index (with a factor of 1000); looking at the [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:PopularPages&limit=100&offset=0 Popular pages] of Scholarpedia one can see that (at the moment) the 51st mos popular page has had 52,700 views (which is >51,000), whilst the 52nd most popular page has <52,000 views, thus the wikiFactor of Scholarpedia (again, at the moment) is 51. The people at [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WikiFactor RationalWiki] have made a rather good page explaining the wikiFactor. All the best --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 10:43, 10 February 2011 (CET)
| |
|
| |
| Hey Carl, thank you for the explanation. I will keep it in mind next time I add another Wiki. Best regards --[[User:JuanManuel]]
| |