User talk:Carl McBride: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This is the discussion page for the user [[User:Carl McBride |Carl McBride]]. To add a new section to this page simply click
This is the discussion page for the user [[User:Carl McBride |Carl McBride]]. To add a new section to this page simply click
on the '''+''' symbol found in the tabs at the top of the page.
on the '''+''' symbol found in the tabs at the top of the page.
 
==VQWiki==
Hola Carl, it is good to get to know you.  I stumbled by chance on  
Hola Carl, it is good to get to know you.  I stumbled by chance on  
your wiki for statistical mechanics, and just added some links,  
your wiki for statistical mechanics, and just added some links,  
Line 9: Line 9:
:Concerning SklogWiki I should like to make a minor distinction; although I am the founder/administrator for SklogWiki, it is not ''my'' wiki; it is for ''everyone'' who shares our interest in stat. mech., thermodynamics, and computer simulation :-D   
:Concerning SklogWiki I should like to make a minor distinction; although I am the founder/administrator for SklogWiki, it is not ''my'' wiki; it is for ''everyone'' who shares our interest in stat. mech., thermodynamics, and computer simulation :-D   
:All the best, --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 18:55, 16 January 2008 (CET)
:All the best, --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 18:55, 16 January 2008 (CET)
 
==Strength of Sklogwiki==
Hola Carl, the strength of Sklogwiki is in the reference to  
Hola Carl, the strength of Sklogwiki is in the reference to  
up-to-date journal articles, even though some Sklogwiki articles need  
up-to-date journal articles, even though some Sklogwiki articles need  
Line 17: Line 17:
in my article, and mentioned the above strength of Sklogwiki.
in my article, and mentioned the above strength of Sklogwiki.
Take care, Loc [[User:Vql|Vql]] 18:44, 19 January 2008 (CET)
Take care, Loc [[User:Vql|Vql]] 18:44, 19 January 2008 (CET)
:Dear [[User:Vql|Loc]], thank you very much for your comments and links to SklogWiki. I totally agree with your perspective regarding SklogWiki. I personally feel that the placement of SklogWiki with the most potential is between the standard text book on one side, and refereed research articles on the other. SklogWiki is about to complete its first year soon, and most of the work so far has been in setting up the general framework and structure of the Wiki. Now that this is in place the focus will shift to 'filling out' the stub pages. Any contributions that you can make to such stub pages would obviously be most appreciated. All the best, --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 11:14, 21 January 2008 (CET)

Revision as of 12:14, 21 January 2008

This is the discussion page for the user Carl McBride. To add a new section to this page simply click on the + symbol found in the tabs at the top of the page.

VQWiki

Hola Carl, it is good to get to know you. I stumbled by chance on your wiki for statistical mechanics, and just added some links, which you can follow to see my wiki, publications, and contact info. Any comments would be welcome. Loc Vql 18:42, 16 January 2008 (CET)

Dear Loc, thank you very much for the link to your (comprehensive) page concerning the configurational integral on VQWiki.
Concerning SklogWiki I should like to make a minor distinction; although I am the founder/administrator for SklogWiki, it is not my wiki; it is for everyone who shares our interest in stat. mech., thermodynamics, and computer simulation :-D
All the best, -- Carl McBride (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2008 (CET)

Strength of Sklogwiki

Hola Carl, the strength of Sklogwiki is in the reference to up-to-date journal articles, even though some Sklogwiki articles need to be written and/or completed to some extent. It is important to continue maintain this strength that clearly distinguishes Sklogwiki from Wikipedia. I linked to some Sklogwiki articles in my article, and mentioned the above strength of Sklogwiki. Take care, Loc Vql 18:44, 19 January 2008 (CET)

Dear Loc, thank you very much for your comments and links to SklogWiki. I totally agree with your perspective regarding SklogWiki. I personally feel that the placement of SklogWiki with the most potential is between the standard text book on one side, and refereed research articles on the other. SklogWiki is about to complete its first year soon, and most of the work so far has been in setting up the general framework and structure of the Wiki. Now that this is in place the focus will shift to 'filling out' the stub pages. Any contributions that you can make to such stub pages would obviously be most appreciated. All the best, -- Carl McBride (talk) 11:14, 21 January 2008 (CET)