Talk:Second virial coefficient: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:: And by the way, if this angle brackets mean the average, hence the second virial coefficient should depend on density, i.e <math>B_2(\rho, T)</math>.
:: And by the way, if this angle brackets mean the average, hence the second virial coefficient should depend on density, i.e <math>B_2(\rho, T)</math>.
::: I highly recommend reading &sect; 12-2 and &sect; 12-3 of "Statistical Mechanics" by Donald A. McQuarrie. The problem is that the integral is often ''very hard'' to integrate analytically for anything other than, say, the [[Hard sphere: virial coefficients | hard sphere model]]. (See also the page on [[cluster integrals]]). The problem mentioned by Hill arises "...from the treatment of an imperfect gas as a perfect gas mixture of physical clusters".  All the best --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 15:54, 3 May 2011 (CEST)

Revision as of 15:54, 3 May 2011

Hello! Could someone please explain the meaning of those angle brackets in the expression of B(T)? 178.140.206.61 07:14, 28 April 2011 (CEST)

In statistical mechanics angle brackets are used to indicate an average, either a time average or, as in this case, an ensemble average. -- Carl McBride (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2011 (CEST)
Yeah, I know it. But the thing is that the common expression for second virial coefficient doesn't have an averaging in it. Anyway, it is said in the article that "Notice that the expression within the parenthesis of the integral is the Mayer f-function." However Mayer f-function has no averaging in it. I was asking because recently I was told that something is wrong with the common expression for the second virial coefficient. Indeed I was referred to the article by Hill by I haven't get it yet.
And by the way, if this angle brackets mean the average, hence the second virial coefficient should depend on density, i.e .
I highly recommend reading § 12-2 and § 12-3 of "Statistical Mechanics" by Donald A. McQuarrie. The problem is that the integral is often very hard to integrate analytically for anything other than, say, the hard sphere model. (See also the page on cluster integrals). The problem mentioned by Hill arises "...from the treatment of an imperfect gas as a perfect gas mixture of physical clusters". All the best -- Carl McBride (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2011 (CEST)