Talk:Lebwohl-Lasher model: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page | according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page | ||
correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET) | correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
Actually I will change the value. Carl, please check, --Noe 16:11, 20 February 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:11, 20 February 2009
Spurious asterisk[edit]
Re: spurious asterisk: Both in the abstract and in the main body of the paper appears, although on a cursory reading I cannot see where it is defined. I shall have to read the paper more closely... -- Carl McBride (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET) OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET)
I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually, according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)
Actually I will change the value. Carl, please check, --Noe 16:11, 20 February 2009 (CET)