Mean field models: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Completed solution, section added.)
m (Added a category)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to
Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to
:<math> U = - J n \sum_i^N S_i \bar{s} , </math>
:<math> U = - J n \sum_i^N S_i \bar{s} , </math>
as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism: the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength
as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism (see  [[Curie's_law]]): the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength
:<math>H= J n \bar{s}.</math>
:<math>H= J n \bar{s}.</math>
The magnetization of the Langevin theory is
The magnetization of the Langevin theory is
Line 33: Line 33:
*It also leads to ''classical critical exponents'', like the <math>\left(1 - \frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{1/2}</math> decay above. In 3-D, the magnetization follows a power law with a different exponent.
*It also leads to ''classical critical exponents'', like the <math>\left(1 - \frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{1/2}</math> decay above. In 3-D, the magnetization follows a power law with a different exponent.
*Nevertheless, above a certain space dimension the critical exponents are correct. This dimension is 4 for the Ising model, as predicted by a self-consistency requirement due to E.M. Lipfshitz (similar ones are due to Peierls and L.D. Landau)
*Nevertheless, above a certain space dimension the critical exponents are correct. This dimension is 4 for the Ising model, as predicted by a self-consistency requirement due to E.M. Lipfshitz (similar ones are due to Peierls and L.D. Landau)
==References==
<references/>
[[Category: Statistical mechanics]]

Latest revision as of 14:17, 14 May 2010

A mean field model, or a mean field solution of a model, is an approximation to the actual solution of a model in statistical physics. The model is made exactly solvable by treating the effect of all other particles on a given one as a mean field (hence its name). It appear in different forms and different contexts, but all mean field models have this feature in common.

Mean field solution of the Ising model[edit]

A well-known mean field solution of the Ising model, known as the Bragg-Williams approximation goes as follows. From the original Hamiltonian,

suppose we may approximate

where is the number of neighbors of site (e.g. 4 in a 2-D square lattice), and is the (unknown) magnetization:

Therefore, the Hamiltonian turns to

as in the regular Langevin theory of magnetism (see Curie's_law): the spins are independent, but coupled to a constant field of strength

The magnetization of the Langevin theory is

Therefore:

This is a self-consistent expression for . There exists a critical temperature, defined by

At temperatures higher than this value the only solution is . Below it, however, this solution becomes unstable (it corresponds to a maximum in energy), whereas two others are stable. Slightly below ,

General discussion[edit]

The solution obtained shares a number of features with any other mean field approximation:

  • It largely ignores geometry, which may be important in some cases. In particular, it reduces the lattice details to just the number of neighbours.
  • As a consequence, it may predict phase transitions where none are found: the 1-D ising model is known to lack any phase transition (at finite temperature)
  • In general, the theory underestimates fluctuations
  • It also leads to classical critical exponents, like the decay above. In 3-D, the magnetization follows a power law with a different exponent.
  • Nevertheless, above a certain space dimension the critical exponents are correct. This dimension is 4 for the Ising model, as predicted by a self-consistency requirement due to E.M. Lipfshitz (similar ones are due to Peierls and L.D. Landau)

References[edit]