Editing Lebwohl-Lasher model
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:<math>T^*_{NI}= \frac{k_BT_{NI}}{\epsilon}=1.1232 \pm 0.0006</math> | :<math>T^*_{NI}= \frac{k_BT_{NI}}{\epsilon}=1.1232 \pm 0.0006</math> | ||
More recently N. V. Priezjev and Robert A. Pelcovits <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.062702 N. V. Priezjev and Robert A. Pelcovits ''Cluster Monte Carlo simulations of the nematic-isotropic transition'' Phys. Rev. E 63, 062702 (2001) [4 pages]] </ref> used a Monte Carlo [[cluster algorithms|cluster algorithm]] and | More recently N. V. Priezjev and Robert A. Pelcovits <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.062702 N. V. Priezjev and Robert A. Pelcovits ''Cluster Monte Carlo simulations of the nematic-isotropic transition'' Phys. Rev. E 63, 062702 (2001) [4 pages]] </ref> used a Monte Carlo [[cluster algorithms|cluster algorithm]] and got: | ||
:<math>T^*_{NI}= \frac{k_BT_{NI}}{\epsilon}=1.1225 \pm 0.0001 </math> | :<math>T^*_{NI}= \frac{k_BT_{NI}}{\epsilon}=1.1225 \pm 0.0001 </math> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The planar Lebwohl–Lasher appears when the lattice considered is two-dimensional. The square lattice is the usual choice for most of the simulation studies. | The planar Lebwohl–Lasher appears when the lattice considered is two-dimensional. The square lattice is the usual choice for most of the simulation studies. | ||
This system exhibits a continuous transition. The ascription of such a transition to the | This system exhibits a continuous transition. The ascription of such a transition to the | ||
[[Kosterlitz-Thouless transition|Kosterlitz-Touless]] type is still under discussion | [[Kosterlitz-Thouless transition|Kosterlitz-Touless]] type is still under discussion. | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00576-0 Enakshi Mondal and Soumen Kumar Roy "Finite size scaling in the planar Lebwohl–Lasher model", Physics Letters A '''312''' pp. 397-410 (2003)]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00576-0 Enakshi Mondal and Soumen Kumar Roy "Finite size scaling in the planar Lebwohl–Lasher model", Physics Letters A '''312''' pp. 397-410 (2003)]</ref> | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(88)90148-3 C. Chiccoli, P. Pasini, and C. Zannoni "A Monte Carlo investigation of the planar Lebwohl–Lasher lattice model", Physica A '''148''' pp. 298-311 (1988)]</ref> | <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(88)90148-3 C. Chiccoli, P. Pasini, and C. Zannoni "A Monte Carlo investigation of the planar Lebwohl–Lasher lattice model", Physica A '''148''' pp. 298-311 (1988)]</ref> | ||
<ref> [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.662 H. Kunz, and G. Zumbach "Topological phase transition in a two-dimensional nematic n-vector model: A numerical study" Physical Review B '''46''', 662-673 (1992) ]</ref> | <ref> [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.662 H. Kunz, and G. Zumbach "Topological phase transition in a two-dimensional nematic n-vector model: A numerical study" Physical Review B '''46''', 662-673 (1992) ]</ref> | ||
<ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051706 Ricardo Paredes V., Ana Isabel Fariñas-Sánchez, and Robert Botet "No quasi-long-range order in a two-dimensional liquid crystal", Physical Review E 78, 051706 (2008)]</ref> | <ref>[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051706 Ricardo Paredes V., Ana Isabel Fariñas-Sánchez, and Robert Botet "No quasi-long-range order in a two-dimensional liquid crystal", Physical Review E 78, 051706 (2008)]</ref> | ||
==Lattice Gas Lebwohl–Lasher model== | ==Lattice Gas Lebwohl–Lasher model== |