Law of corresponding states: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Roberta (talk) to last revision by Carl McBride)
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(38)80037-9 J. de Boer and A. Michels "Contribution to the quantum-mechanical theory of the equation of state and the law of corresponding states. Determination of the law of force of helium", Physica '''5''' pp. 945-957 (1938)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(38)80037-9 J. de Boer and A. Michels "Contribution to the quantum-mechanical theory of the equation of state and the law of corresponding states. Determination of the law of force of helium", Physica '''5''' pp. 945-957 (1938)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3072156 Patrick Grosfils and James F. Lutsko "Dependence of the liquid-vapor surface tension on the range of interaction: A test of the law of corresponding states", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 054703 (2009)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3072156 Patrick Grosfils and James F. Lutsko "Dependence of the liquid-vapor surface tension on the range of interaction: A test of the law of corresponding states", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 054703 (2009)]
[http://www.texas-liability-insurance.com/ Texas liability insurance]
*Hong Wei Xiang "The Corresponding-States Principle and its Practice", Elsevier Science (2005) ISBN 0-444-52062-7
*Hong Wei Xiang "The Corresponding-States Principle and its Practice", Elsevier Science (2005) ISBN 0-444-52062-7
[[category: equations of state]]
[[category: equations of state]]

Revision as of 22:59, 25 September 2010

The law of corresponding states is an empirical law which encapsulates the finding that the equations of state for many real gases are remarkably similar when they are expressed in terms of reduced temperatures (), pressures, () and volumes (), where the subscript represents the value of the property at the critical point. This law was first described by Johannes Diderik van der Waals in his 1873 thesis, and forms the subject of a paper by him in 1913 [1]

Assumptions

Pitzer [2] produced a list of assumptions in order for the law of corresponding states to apply. This list was later modified by Guggenheim [3]. These are:

  1. There is negligible difference between Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose–Einstein statistics for the system (i.e. the system behaves classically).
  2. The effect of quantisation of the translational degrees of freedom is negligible (i.e. the system behaves classically).
  3. The molecules are spherically symmetrical, either actually or by virtue of rapid and free rotation.
  4. The intramolecular degrees of freedom are assumed to be completely independent of the volume per molecule.
  5. The potential energy will be taken as a function only of the various intermolecular distances.
  6. The potential energy for a pair of molecules can be written as where is the intermolecular distance, and and are characteristic constants, and is a universal function.

Examples

For argon, krypton, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and methane one has [3]

(for pressure measured in atmospheres, and volume in cm3mole-1)

For neon, argon, and oxygen one has [3]

where is the Boyle temperature.

For neon, argon, krypton,and xenon one has [3]

where is the triple point.

Acentric factor

The acentric factor [4] is defined in terms of the vapour pressure at . It has been shown that a number of substances have the behavior if they share the same acentric factor.

Colloids

The law of corresponding states has been extended to suspensions of spherical colloids that interact via a pair potential by Noro and Frenkel [5].

References

Related material

Texas liability insurance

  • Hong Wei Xiang "The Corresponding-States Principle and its Practice", Elsevier Science (2005) ISBN 0-444-52062-7