Jarzynski equality: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎References: Added a publication)
m (→‎References: Added a publication)
Line 14: Line 14:
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2978949 L. Y. Chen "On the Crooks fluctuation theorem and the Jarzynski equality", Journal of Chemical Physics '''129''' 091101 (2008)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2978949 L. Y. Chen "On the Crooks fluctuation theorem and the Jarzynski equality", Journal of Chemical Physics '''129''' 091101 (2008)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3132747 Eric N. Zimanyi and Robert J. Silbey "The work-Hamiltonian connection and the usefulness of the Jarzynski equality for free energy calculations", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 171102 (2009)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3132747 Eric N. Zimanyi and Robert J. Silbey "The work-Hamiltonian connection and the usefulness of the Jarzynski equality for free energy calculations", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 171102 (2009)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/5/012 Humberto Híjar and José M Ortiz de Zárate "Jarzynski's equality illustrated by simple examples", European Journal of Physics '''31''' pp. 1097 (2010)]


[[category: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics]]
[[category: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics]]
[[category: fluctuation theorem]]
[[category: fluctuation theorem]]

Revision as of 15:43, 10 June 2011

The Jarzynski equality is also known as the work relation or non-equilibrium work relation. According to this equality, the equilibrium Helmholtz energy function of a process, , can be reconstructed by averaging the external work, , performed in many nonequilibrium realizations of the process (Ref. 1 Eq. 2a):

or can be trivially re-written as (Ref. 1 Eq. 2b)

where is the Boltzmann constant and is the temperature. The proof of this equation is given in Ref. 1 and the only assumption is that of a weak coupling between the system and the reservoir.

References

  1. C. Jarzynski "Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences", Physical Review Letters 78 2690-2693 (1997)

Related reading