Carnahan-Starling equation of state: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added a Kolafa correction section)
Line 73: Line 73:


The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100356a008 Yuhua Song, E. A. Mason, and Richard M. Stratt "Why does the Carnahan-Starling equation work so well?", Journal of Physical Chemistry '''93''' pp. 6916-6919 (1989)]</ref> ).
The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100356a008 Yuhua Song, E. A. Mason, and Richard M. Stratt "Why does the Carnahan-Starling equation work so well?", Journal of Physical Chemistry '''93''' pp. 6916-6919 (1989)]</ref> ).
== Kolafa correction ==
Jiri Kolafa produced a slight correction to the C-S EOS which results in improved accuracy <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4870524 Miguel Robles, Mariano López de Haro and Andrés Santos "Note: Equation of state and the freezing point in the hard-sphere model", Journal of Chemical Physics '''140''' 136101 (2014)]</ref>:
: <math>
Z =  \frac{ 1 + \eta + \eta^2 -  \frac{2}{3}(1+\eta) \eta^3 }{(1-\eta)^3 }.
</math>


== See also ==  
== See also ==  

Revision as of 13:16, 8 April 2014

The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is an approximate (but quite good) equation of state for the fluid phase of the hard sphere model in three dimensions. It is given by (Ref [1] Eqn. 10).

where:

Virial expansion

It is interesting to compare the virial coefficients of the Carnahan-Starling equation of state (Eq. 7 of [1]) with the hard sphere virial coefficients in three dimensions (exact up to , and those of Clisby and McCoy [2]):

Clisby and McCoy
2 4 4
3 10 10
4 18.3647684 18
5 28.224512 28
6 39.8151475 40
7 53.3444198 54
8 68.5375488 70
9 85.8128384 88
10 105.775104 108

Thermodynamic expressions

From the Carnahan-Starling equation for the fluid phase the following thermodynamic expressions can be derived (Ref [3] Eqs. 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8)

Pressure (compressibility):


Configurational chemical potential:

Isothermal compressibility:

where is the packing fraction.

Configurational Helmholtz energy function:

The 'Percus-Yevick' derivation

It is interesting to note (Ref [4] Eq. 6) that one can arrive at the Carnahan-Starling equation of state by adding two thirds of the exact solution of the Percus Yevick integral equation for hard spheres via the compressibility route, to one third via the pressure route, i.e.

The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. [5] ).

Kolafa correction

Jiri Kolafa produced a slight correction to the C-S EOS which results in improved accuracy [6]:

See also

References