Wikis and Science 2.0 - Revision history

Carl McBride: Added a book and an interview

2014-04-07T11:32:16Z

Added a book and an interview

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 7 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)]		*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438548a Declan Butler "Science in the web age: Joint efforts", Nature '''438''' pp. 548-549 1 December (2005)]
	<blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Yet scientists are largely being left behind in this second revolution, as they are proving slow to adopt many of the latest technologies that could help them communicate online more rapidly and collaboratively than they do now."</blockquote>
			==2006==
			* Jane Klobas " Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration", Woodhead Publishing Limited (2006) ISBN 978-1-84334-178-9
	==2007==		==2007==
	*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)]		*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)]
Line 81:		Line 83:
	*[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all Thomas Lin "Cracking Open the Scientific Process", The New York Times January 16, 2012]		*[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all Thomas Lin "Cracking Open the Scientific Process", The New York Times January 16, 2012]
	<blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>
			==2014==
			* [http://divulgauned.es/el-formato-wiki-tiene-mucho-potencial-frente-a-libros-de-texto-en-papel/ Carl McBride "El formato wiki tiene mucho potencial frente a libros de texto en papel", divulgaUNED, 31 March (2014)]



	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: /* 2009 */ Added an article

2012-06-04T14:59:16Z

2009: Added an article

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 4 June 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:
	*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)]		*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/38904 Michael Nielsen "Doing science in the open", physicsworld.com May 1, (2009)]
	<blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Online networking tools are pervasive, but why have scientists been so slow to adopt many of them? Michael Nielsen explains how we can build a better culture of online collaboration"</blockquote>
			*[http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2009summer/article6.html John B. Stafford "Scientists built the web. Do they love web 2.0?", Stanford Medicine (Summer 2009)]
			<blockquote>"And as these services have become household names, a constellation of applications for scientists started to gather under a “Science 2.0” banner: video journals and wikis for sharing protocols, and even social networks for researchers along the lines of Facebook. Their aim is to make scientific collaboration as easy as sharing videos of trips home from the dentist. Not many scientists are biting, though."</blockquote>
	*[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).]		*[http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/phd-thesis Felipe Ortega "Wikipedia: A Quantiative Analysis", PhD Thesis, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2009).]
	*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)]		*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8325875.stm Jason Palmer "Science enters the age of Web 2.0", BBC News 26 October (2009)]
Line 52:		Line 54:
	<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>
	<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>

	==2010==		==2010==
	*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010]		*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010]

Carl McBride: Corrected publication date

2012-06-04T14:51:58Z

Corrected publication date

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 4 June 2012
Line 53:		Line 53:
	<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>
	==2010==		==2010==
			*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED May 20 2010]
			<blockquote>"The next generation of PIs is already establishing new behaviors. They feel comfortable blogging, using social media tools, and using wikis to advance their research." (Adam Bly) </blockquote>
	*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]		*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]
	<blockquote>"...some researchers regard blogs, wikis and other novel forms of communication as a waste of time or even dangerous."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...some researchers regard blogs, wikis and other novel forms of communication as a waste of time or even dangerous."</blockquote>
Line 77:		Line 79:
	<blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>

	*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED June 4 2012]
	<blockquote>"The next generation of PIs is already establishing new behaviors. They feel comfortable blogging, using social media tools, and using wikis to advance their research." (Adam Bly) </blockquote>


	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: Added a couple of links in the 2012 section

2012-06-04T14:33:25Z

Added a couple of links in the 2012 section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 4 June 2012
Line 73:		Line 73:
	the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication		the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication
	within the community."</blockquote>		within the community."</blockquote>
			==2012==
			*[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all Thomas Lin "Cracking Open the Scientific Process", The New York Times January 16, 2012]
			<blockquote>"...advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction. "</blockquote>

			*[http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/ Adrienne J. Burke "Science 2.0 Pioneers", SEED June 4 2012]
			<blockquote>"The next generation of PIs is already establishing new behaviors. They feel comfortable blogging, using social media tools, and using wikis to advance their research." (Adam Bly) </blockquote>


	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride at 10:32, 30 January 2012

2012-01-30T10:32:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 30 January 2012
Line 65:		Line 65:
	p. 179		p. 179
	<blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>
	*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Phys_Sci_case_study_full_report.pdf Eric T. Meyer, Monica Bulger, Avgousta Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, Lucy Power, Peter Williams, Will Venters, Melissa Terras, Sally Wyatt "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery", RIN, Institute of Physics (IOP), Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP) and Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) December 2011]		*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Phys_Sci_case_study_full_report.pdf Eric T. Meyer, Monica Bulger, Avgousta Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, Lucy Power, Peter Williams, Will Venters, Melissa Terras, Sally Wyatt "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery", RIN, Institute of Physics (IOP), Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP) and Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) December 2011] p. 28
	<blockquote>"Developments in web 2.0 technologies have also affected		<blockquote>"Developments in web 2.0 technologies have also affected
	communications. While static websites and emails predated		communications. While static websites and emails predated
Line 72:		Line 72:
	them more interconnected. All participants indicated that		them more interconnected. All participants indicated that
	the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication		the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication
	within the community."</blockquote> ~~(p. 28)~~		within the community."</blockquote>

	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: Added quote from "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery"

2012-01-30T10:32:01Z

Added quote from "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 30 January 2012
Line 65:		Line 65:
	p. 179		p. 179
	<blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>
			*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Phys_Sci_case_study_full_report.pdf Eric T. Meyer, Monica Bulger, Avgousta Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, Lucy Power, Peter Williams, Will Venters, Melissa Terras, Sally Wyatt "Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery", RIN, Institute of Physics (IOP), Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP) and Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) December 2011]
			<blockquote>"Developments in web 2.0 technologies have also affected
			communications. While static websites and emails predated
			the web within particle physics, wiki pages provide a much
			more interactive element to their collaboration and make
			them more interconnected. All participants indicated that
			the wiki has become a mainstream way of communication
			within the community."</blockquote> (p. 28)

	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: Added quotes from Michael Nielsen "Reinventing Discovery"

2011-11-08T16:23:29Z

Added quotes from Michael Nielsen "Reinventing Discovery"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 8 November 2011
Line 59:		Line 59:
	*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]		*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]
	<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>
			==2011==
			*Michael Nielsen "Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science", Princeton University Press (2011) ISBN 9780691148908
			p. 176
			<blockquote>"'''Science Wikis''' ...to provide a single, centralized reference describing all the latest research... ...a sort of rapidly evolving, constantly updated super-textbook. ...the potential to go far beyond a textbook: it would be infinitely extensible and modifiable, capable of conveying material ranging from simple introductions of key concepts all the way up to detailed explanations of the latest research reults..."</blockquote>
			p. 179
			<blockquote>"Wiki-science, as promising as it might be, remains a dream"</blockquote>

	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: Added a selection of quotes from the Research Information Network report

2011-07-01T13:44:53Z

Added a selection of quotes from the Research Information Network report

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 1 July 2011
Line 52:		Line 52:
	<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>
	<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>

	==2010==		==2010==
	*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]		*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]
			<blockquote>"...some researchers regard blogs, wikis and other novel forms of communication as a waste of time or even dangerous."</blockquote>
			<blockquote>"We found that current levels of take-up are relatively low, with 13% of respondents using such tools frequently (once a week or more), 45% using them occasionally, and 39% using them not at all."</blockquote>
			<blockquote>"...few services have yet achieved the critical mass needed to achieve the positive network effects that stimulate pervasive use by particular communities."</blockquote>
	*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]		*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]
	<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>
	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: /* 2010 */ Added link to a Research Information Network report

2011-06-30T09:57:10Z

2010: Added link to a Research Information Network report

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 30 June 2011
Line 54:		Line 54:

	==2010==		==2010==
			*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0" A Research Information Network report July (2010)]
	*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]		*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]
	<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>
	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]

Carl McBride: Added an article

2010-08-20T13:19:34Z

Added an article

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 20 August 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)]		*[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/26711 Martin Griffiths "Talking physics in the social Web", Physics World '''20''' January pp. 24-28 (2007)]
	*[http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140 Dennis M. Wilkinson, Bernardo A. Huberman "Assessing the Value of Coooperation in Wikipedia", arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140]		*[http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140 Dennis M. Wilkinson, Bernardo A. Huberman "Assessing the Value of Coooperation in Wikipedia", arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0702140]
	*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news070226-6 Philip Ball "The more, the wikier", Nature news 27 February 2007]		*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news070226-6 Philip Ball "The more, the wikier", Nature news 27 February (2007)]
	*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0307-231 Brandon Keim "WikiMedia", Nature Medicine '''13''' pp. 231-233 (2007)]		*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0307-231 Brandon Keim "WikiMedia", Nature Medicine '''13''' pp. 231-233 (2007)]
	<blockquote>"Uneasy with information websites policed by people with little expertise, scientists are creating their own online encyclopedias"</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Uneasy with information websites policed by people with little expertise, scientists are creating their own online encyclopedias"</blockquote>
Line 19:		Line 19:

	==2008==		==2008==
	*[http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/wikipedia-community-publishing.html Tim O’Reilly "Wikipedia: A community of editors or a community of authors?", January 3 2008]		*[http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/wikipedia-community-publishing.html Tim O’Reilly "Wikipedia: A community of editors or a community of authors?", January 3 (2008)]
	<blockquote>"This is why publishers should be studying Wikipedia (and YouTube, and Google) -- because they are all showing us the new face of publishing. At their heart, they involve new means of content creation yes, but more profoundly, they involve new means of curation. Wikipedia creates a context within which authors can exercise their skills, displaying their knowledge and their passion. Yes, it allows for collaborative creation, and that's good."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"This is why publishers should be studying Wikipedia (and YouTube, and Google) -- because they are all showing us the new face of publishing. At their heart, they involve new means of content creation yes, but more profoundly, they involve new means of curation. Wikipedia creates a context within which authors can exercise their skills, displaying their knowledge and their passion. Yes, it allows for collaborative creation, and that's good."</blockquote>
	*[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk&page=1 M. Mitchell Waldrop "Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk?", Scientific American January 9 (2008)] (see also: Scientific American May Vol. 298 Issue 5 pp. 68-73 (2008))		*[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk&page=1 M. Mitchell Waldrop "Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk?", Scientific American January 9 (2008)] (see also: Scientific American May Vol. 298 Issue 5 pp. 68-73 (2008))
Line 52:		Line 52:
	<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"...there are few signs that academics are really embracing the new opportunities offered by Web 2.0. Many academics’ idea of online collaboration is still emailing the findings they have arrived at independently to one another, while their notion of an innovative method of promoting research results is the obligatory ‘project web site’. Such sites usually offer little more than a description of the project..."</blockquote>
	<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>		<blockquote>"Much of the blame for the slow adoption of the Web 2.0 technologies seemingly lies with an over-emphasis on the traditional research paper."</blockquote>

			==2010==
			*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727742.800-flawed-proof-ushers-in-era-of-wikimaths.html "Flawed proof ushers in era of wikimaths", NewScientist 20 August (2010)]
			<blockquote>"...a flurry of online activity that points to a new way of doing mathematics - via blogs and wikis."</blockquote>
	[[category: miscellaneous]]		[[category: miscellaneous]]