Talk:Lebwohl-Lasher model - Revision history

Noe at 15:11, 20 February 2009

2009-02-20T15:11:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 20 February 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page		according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page
	correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)		correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)

			----
			Actually I will change the value. Carl, please check, --Noe 16:11, 20 February 2009 (CET)

Noe at 14:10, 20 February 2009

2009-02-20T14:10:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 20 February 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something		I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something
	different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually,		different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually,
	according to the abstract of the paper the ~~actual temperature of the transition is not~~ the ~~one~~ is in the page,		according to the abstract of the paper, both the notation and the value that is currently in the Sklogwiki page
	~~but~~ such a "divergence temperature"; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)		correspond to such a "divergence temperature" and not to the proper trasntion temperatire; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)

Noe: /* Spurious asterisk */

2009-02-20T14:05:36Z

Spurious asterisk

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 20 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride \| <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride \|talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET)		I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride \| <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride \|talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET)
	OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET)		OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET)

			----

			I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something
			different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually,
			according to the abstract of the paper the actual temperature of the transition is not the one is in the page,
			but such a "divergence temperature"; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)

Noe: /* Spurious asterisk */

2009-02-20T13:53:41Z

Spurious asterisk

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 20 February 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Re: spurious asterisk: Both in the abstract and in the main body of the paper <math>NI^*</math> appears, although on a cursory reading I cannot see where it is defined.		Re: spurious asterisk: Both in the abstract and in the main body of the paper <math>NI^*</math> appears, although on a cursory reading I cannot see where it is defined.
	I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride \| <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride \|talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET)		I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride \| <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride \|talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET)
			OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET)

Carl McBride: Re: spurious asterisk

2009-02-20T13:38:19Z

Re: spurious asterisk

New page

==Spurious asterisk==
Re: spurious asterisk: Both in the abstract and in the main body of the paper <math>NI^*</math> appears, although on a cursory reading I cannot see where it is defined.
I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET)